<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Butler Twp., OH: BSL treats victims unequally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopbsl.org/2009/10/08/butler-twp-oh-bsl-treats-victims-unequally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopbsl.org/2009/10/08/butler-twp-oh-bsl-treats-victims-unequally/</link>
	<description>Your Community. Safe. Smart. Humane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheil</title>
		<link>http://stopbsl.org/2009/10/08/butler-twp-oh-bsl-treats-victims-unequally/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Sheil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopbsl.com/?p=2320#comment-2373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article says that the dog is a mastiff-mix. Its license lists the breed as &quot;mix-mixed&quot; [?]. The next space on the license form asks whether the dog is a mixed breed. The &#039;no&#039; box is checked. The dog may very well be a pit-bull under Ohio law. That&#039;s not the point now. Mr. Kumpf says &#039;to be considered vicious, a dog must be part of the pit bull breed or have a history.&#039; As of now, the dog still has no history. If the dog warden would do his job and declare the dog vicious, Mr. Pelsor would be cited for &quot;vicious dog running at large&quot; next time it gets loose. If it gets loose now, it would still be &quot;dog running at large.&quot; As for a civil hearing, we might be able to recover $175, the cost of our dog. Mr. Kumpf is being disingenuous. It is up to Mr. Kumpf to apply the vicious dog laws, not me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article says that the dog is a mastiff-mix. Its license lists the breed as &#8220;mix-mixed&#8221; [?]. The next space on the license form asks whether the dog is a mixed breed. The &#8216;no&#8217; box is checked. The dog may very well be a pit-bull under Ohio law. That&#8217;s not the point now. Mr. Kumpf says &#8216;to be considered vicious, a dog must be part of the pit bull breed or have a history.&#8217; As of now, the dog still has no history. If the dog warden would do his job and declare the dog vicious, Mr. Pelsor would be cited for &#8220;vicious dog running at large&#8221; next time it gets loose. If it gets loose now, it would still be &#8220;dog running at large.&#8221; As for a civil hearing, we might be able to recover $175, the cost of our dog. Mr. Kumpf is being disingenuous. It is up to Mr. Kumpf to apply the vicious dog laws, not me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

