Monthly Archives: May 2010

Auburn, CA: Pit bull regulations discussed

The city council may bring the proposed BSL up for discussion next on June 14th at 6 p.m. at 1225 Lincoln Way, Auburn, CA.

Previous alerts for Auburn: http://stopbsl.com/?s=%22auburn%2C+ca%22

Auburn city officals contact info
City Council

Mike Holmes, Mayor
njrhs@inreach.com

Bridget Powers, Mayor Pro Tempore
bridgetpowers@sbcglobal.net

Keith Nesbitt, Council Member
mr.auburn@sbcglobal.net

Kevin Hanley, Council Member
hanleykh@jps.net

Dr. Bill Kirby, Council Member
flyingsurgeon210@yahoo.com

City Council, City of Auburn, 1225 Lincoln Way, Auburn, CA 95603
Phone: (530) 823-4211, ext. 112
Fax: (530) 823-4216

City Manager Office, 1225 Lincoln Way, Room 9, Auburn, CA 95603
Phone: (530) 823-4211, ext. 191
Fax: (530) 823-4216

Robert Richardson, City Manager
(530) 823-4211, ext. 192
rrichardson@auburn.ca.gov

Police Chief Valerie Harris
530-823-4211 Ext 201

Possible pitbull regulations

Pitbull-lovers came to voice their opinions to the City Council Monday

By Bridget Jones Journal staff writer
bridgetj@goldcountrymedia.com
5/25/10

Dog enthusiasts opposed possible breed-specific regulations focusing on pitbulls at an Auburn City Council meeting Monday….

The proposed amendments would enforce the spay and neuter of … dogs resembling the pitbull breed, according to city documents.

The amendments, which were presented in a first reading only, would also enforce no more than two dogs of all breeds be kept in each residential home. Spay and neuter regulations would only apply to pitbulls.

Full article retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://auburnjournal.com/detail/150769.html

Garland, TX: Fencing Requirement for Pit Bull Dogs

Texas state law (Texas Health & Safety Code §822.047) prohibits breed-specific ordinances. Garland, TX, has recently instituted breed-specific fencing requirements for “pit bulls.” However, it does not appear to be officially codified in the city’s ordinances; at the moment, they are calling this an “ordinance-based directive.”

Garland is attempting to “sweeten the deal”–perhaps to quiet objections–by saying that because of this ordinance, they can now start adopting out “pit bulls” from their animal shelter, something which they refused to do in the past. Yet, finding good homes for pit bulls is done elsewhere in Texas on a regular basis without the need for breed-specific ordinances, and without the need to discriminate against all “pit bull” owners in the city.

If secure fences are important for “pit bull” ownership, it is because they are important for dog ownership in general; all dog owners should be held to the same requirements and should be expected to provide the same standards of care for their dogs. There is no legitimate reason why “pit bull” owners should be required to have secure fences while owners of other breeds or types of dogs are not required to have the same.

Please note it is unclear what, if anything, city council members know about this directive. Please direct primary correspondence to the creators of this directive: Jason Chessher (Deputy Director of Health) and Diana Oats (Animal Services Manager). Correspondence to city council should be made with the consideration that council members may not be well-informed about the directive.

The Animal Services Advisory Committee has been working on this directive. Next public meeting of the committee: 12:30 PM on Friday, July 16, 2010 in the City Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 200 N. 5th St.

Contact information for city officials:

Jason Chessher, Deputy Director of Health, JChesshe@ci.garland.tx.us
972-205-3534

Diana Oats, Animal Services Manager, DOats@ci.garland.tx.us
972-205-3545

Mayor Ronald Jones, mayor@ci.garland.tx.us
972-205-2400

Douglas Athas, council1@ci.garland.tx.us
972-205-2121

Laura Perkins Cox, council2@ci.garland.tx.us
214-364-9319

Preston Edwards, council3@ci.garland.tx.us
972-271-1908

Larry Jeffus, council4@ci.garland.tx.us
972-686-5698

John Willis, council5@ci.garland.tx.us
214-957-7979

Barbara Chick, council6@ci.garland.tx.us
972-276-2524

Rick Williams, council7@ci.garland.tx.us
972-495-9545

Darren Lathen, council8@ci.garland.tx.us
972-465-0435

http://www.ci.garland.tx.us/Home/Departments/Community+Services/Animal+Services/as09Pitbull_Landing.htm

Fencing Requirement for Pit Bull Dogs

Complete directive language:

Fencing Requirement – Pit Bull Dogs

Fencing Requirement – Pit Bull Dogs (Spanish Version)

News Release sent May 24, 2010

Garland, Texas – May 24, 2010 — Garland Animal Services is preparing to enforce new fencing requirements for pit bull dogs or pit bull crossbreeds. Pit bull dogs or crossbreeds thereof have been responsible for the most dog bites since statistics have been kept (2004). Additionally, 27% of the dogs caught while running at large are pit bull dogs. In response to this growing public safety problem, Garland Animal Services has developed an ordinance based directive that requires owners of pit bull dogs to maintain the animals within a six foot fence.

Specifically, the fence must meet the following requirements:

  • The fence must be six feet tall, measured from the ground.
  • The fence must be constructed of wooden planks at least ½ inch thick or 11 gage chain link fencing.
  • There may be no gaps or openings larger than 2 inches.
  • Fencing must be firmly attached to brace posts buried no less than 18 inches deep.
  • All gates must have a locking mechanism that keeps the gates securely closed.

These directive requirements become effective August 1, 2010.

Pit bull dog owners are exempt from the aforementioned requirements if their dogs are properly registered prior to August 1, 2010 and if they maintain compliance with all applicable Animal Service Ordinances such as the display of city tags and not allowing the dogs to run at large. Pit bull dogs not registered prior to August 1, 2010 must be maintained within an enclosure that meets these requirements. Owners who obtain pit bull dogs after August 1st must consider the cost of fence construction as a cost of owning a pit bull dog.

Pointe Coupee Parish, LA reminder: Police Jury to consider BSL (10 breeds), May 25

The proposed ordinance is certainly breed-specific regulation, and may become a ban. The proposal would affect the following: “German shepherds, Doberman pinschers, Rottweilers, boxers, Akitas, chow chows and any of the four breeds that fall under the pit bull umbrella.”

Next Police Jury meeting: May 25, 5:00 PM
Police Jury Meeting Room, Courthouse Annex Building,160 East Main Street (located across the street from the courthouse), New Roads, Louisiana

Previous alerts for Pointe Coupee, with contact information for Police Jurors: http://stopbsl.com/?s=pointe+coupee

Kirksville, MO: Breed ban proposed

Thanks to Jodi for this alert!

The City of Kirksville, Missouri is currently considering an ordinance that would regulate the ownership of “pit bulls” and “other animals deemed vicious.” While the ordinance being drafted includes a grandfather clause, Councilman (and Mayor Pro Tem) Richard Detweiler is pushing for a total ban with no grandfather clause.

The article is confusing in that it indicates that Kirksville already has a vicious dog ordinance that includes pit bulls. However, a review of the city code does not support that statement. Kirksville has a generic vicious dog ordinance which, if properly enforced, would adequately address any vicious dog – not only those labeled as “pit bulls.”

Please send your POLITE, RESPECTFUL and INFORMATIVE letters in opposition to breed specific legislation to the Kirksville, Missouri officials listed below. Please also list viable alternatives and suggestions for their consideration, as well.

According to the article, the next possible time this issue could come up is June 7, and a public hearing will be held to gauge the community’s opinion on the ordinance. The city council meets the first & third Monday of every month at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall Council Chambers. City Council Study Sessions are held the first & third Monday of every month at 4:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers

Jodi Preis
Bless the Bullys
www.blessthebullys.com

City of Kirksville, 201 South Franklin Street, Kirksville, MO 63501
660-627-1225
Toll Free: 888-299-1223
660-665-0940 (fax)

City Council:
Todd Kuhns, Mayor, tkuhns@kirksvillecity.com
Richard Detweiler, rdetweiler@kirksvillecity.com
Carolyn Chrisman, cchrisman@kirksvillecity.com
Tony Fajkus, tfajkus@kirksvillecity.com
Martha Rowe, mrowe@kirksvillecity.com
City Manager Mari Macomber, mmacomber@kirksvillecity.com
City Clerk Vicki Brumbaugh, vbrumbaugh@kirksvillecity.com

Breed ban a polarizing issue

By Taylor Muller
Daily Express
Fri May 21, 2010, 12:37 PM CDT

Kirksville, Mo. – The Kirksville city council will continue to examine the possibility of a breed specific ban on dogs….

The possible ordinance has its supporters and opponents, with city officials waiting to hear public response before moving forward.

Council member Richard Detweiler … said he believed steps short of a total ban, with a grandfather clause allowing for current pit bulls to remain, would not accomplish what was necessary.

“The insurance isn’t going to work,” he said. “Those people aren’t going to get liability insurance for their own vehicles, much less their dog.”

Full story retrieved May 23, 2010 from http://www.kirksvilledailyexpress.com/news/x1070020465/Breed-ban-a-polarizing-issue

Andover, MA: Whispers of BSL

Clamp down on pit bulls?: Defenders call for focus on owners, not breed

By Neil Fater Staff Writer
May 20, 2010

[...]Some residents are talking about banning pit bulls….

Animal Law professors Holly Vietzke and Diane Sullivan, of the Massachusetts School of Law in Andover, said they would rather see legislation aimed at enforcing more responsible pet guardianship, than at banning entire breeds.

Full article retrieved May 21, 2010 from http://www.andovertownsman.com/local/x2023213907/Clamp-down-on-pit-bulls-Defenders-call-for-focus-on-owners-not-breed

La Quinta, CA: BSL dropped

Previous alerts for La Quinta: http://stopbsl.com/?s=la+quinta

La Quinta looking to add bite to dog laws

Mariecar Mendoza • The Desert Sun • May 20, 2010

[...] Suggestions discussed Tuesday but withdrawn on advice of the city attorney included requiring liability insurance for dog owners and requiring specific dog breeds to be spayed or neutered[...]

Article retrieved 5/20/10 from http://www.mydesert.com/article/20100520/NEWS01/5200302/1026/news12/La-Quinta-looking-to-add-bite-to-dog-laws

Boston, MA: Boston pol aims to ‘put teeth’ in dog law

Boston pol aims to ‘put teeth’ in dog law

By Laurel J. Sweet
Monday, May 17, 2010

Hyde Park City Councilor Robert Consalvo will Wednesday file a home-rule petition… [to attach liens against "pitbull" owners with unpaid tickets for breed-specific offenses, such as not muzzling their dogs, not registering their dogs, or not putting up warning signs].

Full article retrieved May 17, 2010 from http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1255322