Monthly Archives: April 2011

Xenia, OH: Council to discuss breed ban, April 14

Xenia, OH will discuss a proposed pit bull ban during a special session tonight, April 14, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, City Hall, 101 N. Detroit Street, Xenia. Residents may speak at the council meeting. Keep in mind, Ohio already labels all “pit bulls” to be “vicious” dogs, and places restrictions on their ownership.

Contact information for city officials:
Jeanne Mills, Council President, jmills@ci.xenia.oh.us
William (Bill) R. Miller, Vice President, bmiller@ci.xenia.oh.us
Marsha J. Bayless, Mayor, mbayless@ci.xenia.oh.us
John G. Caupp, jcaupp@ci.xenia.oh.us
Michael D. Engle, mengle@ci.xenia.oh.us
Dale Louderback, dlouderback@ci.xenia.oh.us
Wesley Smith, wsmith@ci.xenia.oh.us
City Clerk, (937) 376-7235, mjohnson@ci.xenia.oh.us

Email block for cut and paste:
jmills@ci.xenia.oh.us; bmiller@ci.xenia.oh.us; mbayless@ci.xenia.oh.us; jcaupp@ci.xenia.oh.us; mengle@ci.xenia.oh.us; dlouderback@ci.xenia.oh.us; wsmith@ci.xenia.oh.us; mjohnson@ci.xenia.oh.us

Xenia Considering Banning Pit Bulls

Posted: 10:29 pm EDT April 13, 2011

XENIA, Ohio — An proposed ordinance would outlaw keeping pit bulls as pets inside Xenia city limits.

Xenia City Council will discuss the issue in a special session Thursday night. [...]

The proposed ban in Xenia does not mention protecting people who already own pit bulls.

Full article retrieved 4/14/11 from http://www.whiotv.com/news/27539231/detail.html

Subang Jaya, Malaysia: Seven breeds banned

Perplexingly, though the article cites several attacks by Rottweilers and public concern and comments are focused primarily on Rottweilers, that breed has not been targeted by the new breed ban.

The ban goes into effect immediately and does not contain a grandfather clause.

Pit bull among seven breeds banned in Subang Jaya

By EDWARD R. HENRY, edward@thestar.com.my

SEVEN dog breeds — Akita, Neapolitan Mastiff, American Bulldog, Dogo Argentino, Fila Brasileiro, Japanesa Tosa and American Pit bull — are set to vanish from households in Subang Jaya soon.[...]

MPSJ director Dr Roslan Mohamed Hussin said the ban was with immediate effect.

He said the council had begun operations to check residential areas in the township for such dog breeds.[...]

Full article retrieved 4/14/11 from http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/4/14/central/8475437&sec=central

Hopkinton, IA: Rottweilers not added to breed ban list

Hopkinton, IA already bans “pit bulls,” and was considering adding Rottweilers to the ban after a fatality involving two Rottweilers.

Emotions have cooled, citizens and councils appear to have come to the conclusion that a ban on Rottweilers would be “unfair.” Interesting double standard. (Headline is similarly misleading.)

Hopkinton will not ban specific dog breeds

Monday, April 11, 2011
BY ERIC MANDEL

HOPKINTON, Iowa — There will be no additional dog breed ban in the city of Hopkinton, after the City Council agreed Monday night not to change its dangerous animal ordinance in the wake of 3-year-old Vanessa Husmann’s death.[...]

Full article retrieved 4/12/11 from http://www.thonline.com/article.cfm?id=317740

All alerts for Hopkinton: http://stopbsl.com/?s=hopkinton

Aurora, CO: Council considers partial breed ban repeal

Aurora, CO city council has agreed to consider a repeal the breed ban on seven breeds (American Bulldogs, Cane Corsos, Dogo Argentinos, Fila Brasileiros, Presa Mallorquins, Presa Canarios, Tosa Inus, and any mixed breed dog resembling one of these), but the ban on “pit bulls” (APBT, AST, SBT, and mixes resembling one of these) will remain in place. There will be an exemption process for service dogs.

The council only had ears and eyes for “pit bull” bite numbers, and ignored the data that demonstrated that non-restricted breeds’ bites, including severe bites, have not decreased since the ban went into place. Evidently, Aurora city council doesn’t care about its residents unless they are bitten by a “pit bull”-looking dog.

All alerts for Aurora: http://stopbsl.com/?s=aurora%2C+co

City Council compromise: Breed ban would stay, list would shrink

Posted: Monday, April 11, 2011 8:34 pm | Updated: 10:52 pm, Mon Apr 11, 2011.
SARA CASTELLANOS, The Aurora Sentinel

AURORA | A proposal would allow pit bulls in Aurora only as service dogs while whittling the list of restricted breeds from 10 to three.

That was the compromise that Aurora City Council members came to at their Monday study session meeting. The issue will come before them for a formal vote on April 25.[...]

Full article retrieved 4/12/11 from http://www.aurorasentinel.com/email_push/news/article_80940f74-64ad-11e0-ba39-001cc4c002e0.html

 

Aurora, CO: Committee to consider repeal of BSL, April 11

Aurora city council will contemplate a variety of actions regarding their current BSL, including a possible repeal of the law. Notably, staff is referencing Dogsbite and quotes from a very old news article to support their BSL, while their own bite statistics clearly demonstrate that the BSL has not improved public safety whatsoever.

What: City Council Study Session, 1st Floor Aurora Room, Monday, April 11, 2011, 5:30 p.m

Thanks to Jodi for this additional info:

The meeting in which they are discussing changing the law is the study session meeting, prior to the city council meeting… While you can not speak at the study session meeting, it gives a huge message to council members when there are several people in the room. They will not be discussing this matter at the regular city council meeting at 7:30, but you can speak with a time limit of 3 minutes at that meeting if you wish.

Email acpromotingresponsibleownership@yahoo.com for questions.

View the council discussion packet here: https://www.auroragov.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/article-publication/450144.pdf

Contact:
Aurora Mayor and City Council, 15151 E. Alameda Parkway, Fifth Floor, Aurora, CO 80012
303-739-7015
citycouncil@auroragov.org

Patterson, LA: BSL passed

Thanks to Jodi for this article. Patterson is very small town and was not on anyone’s radar.

Another city approves pit bull restrictions

Posted: Apr 7, 2011 10:33 PM by Shawn Kline

For pit bull owners, the collar is getting tighter almost everywhere you go.

Patterson city council passing an ordinance Tuesday restricting the ownership of pit bulls, but is the city just picking a bone? [...]

Full article retrieved 4/8/11 from http://www.katc.com/news/another-city-approves-pit-bull-restrictions

Saginaw, MI: Breed-specific ordinance proposed

Saginaw, MI, has been hashing out the details of their dangerous dog ordinance for months. The ordinance is finally available online, and despite some news reports to the contrary, it is indeed breed-specific.

The ordinance definition of “dangerous dog” includes

(C) Any dog of a breed that appears consistently in the top five (5) of the breeds on credible, analytical listings of “Most Dangerous Dogs” as verified and supplemented by local data and records for Saginaw County. The “list” shall include any dog that by physical appearance could be believed by any reasonable person to have sufficient physical or temperamental characteristics or behaviors to be a “mix” of any of the breeds listed or a “mix” with a non-listed dog where the mixture exhibits the dominant physical appearance of a dog on the list, and any other dog that has the substantial physical characteristics and appearance of those breeds on the list. Such list shall be updated annually and available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office.

This year’s “dangerous breed” list singles out “pit bull,” Rottweiler, German Shepherd, Bull Mastiff (Presna Canario) [sic], and Alaskan Malamute.

  • How did the city select these breeds (and types, since “pit bull” is not a breed)?
  • What breeds are they including in the “pit bull” category? That’s at least three breeds right there.
  • Do they realize that Bull Mastiffs and Presa Canarios are not the same breed? That’s two different breeds. [Ed note: I have seen this bizarre combo of breeds done in only one other place--in Merritt Clifton's non-credible report of dog bites by breed. Clifton's report has been extensively debunked here and elsewhere. If Saginaw is using Clifton's "data" to produce their list, that reflects very badly on them.]
  • Why are they calling it a “top five” list when the list clearly encompasses eight or more breeds?
  • Which “credible, analytical listings of ‘Most Dangerous Dogs’” are they using (especially since none exist)? [Ed note: Primary source appears to be Merritt Clifton's non-credible piece of garbage.]
  • What county data is being used to compile this list, and where can the public go to view that data?
  • Who is responsible for collecting new data and releasing a new list every year?

The ordinance leaves these questions, and many more, unanswered. Keep in mind, too, that Code Enforcement officials will be responsible for breed identification.

Locals are encouraged to voice their concerns and request removal of the breed-specific portion of the ordinance. The ordinance will be discussed again at an upcoming council meeting.

City of Saginaw City Hall, 1315 S. Washington Ave., Saginaw, MI 48601
Phone: (989) 759-1400
Fax: (989) 759-1607

Mayor Greg Branch, anngreg@chartermi.net
Amos O’Neal, amossam@charter.net
Dennis Browning, dbrowning125@charter.net
Dan Fitzpatrick, dlfitz@ameritech.net or danfitzpatrickonline@gmail.com
Larry Coulouris, lcoulouris@yahoo.com
Amanda Kitterman-Miller, akitterman@spsd.net
Dr. William “Bill” Scharffe, drbills@charter.net
Paul Virciglio, Ptvirciglio90@charter.net
Andrew Wendt, wendtmsu93@yahoo.com

Email quicklist
anngreg@chartermi.net; amossam@charter.net; dbrowning125@charter.net; dlfitz@ameritech.net; lcoulouris@yahoo.com; akitterman@spsd.net; drbills@charter.net; Ptvirciglio90@charter.net; wendtmsu93@yahoo.com

All alerts for Saginaw: http://stopbsl.com/?s=saginaw