Category Archives: BSL Defeated

North Carolina bill to restrict multiple breeds is nixed

Rep. Rodney Moore, of North Carolina, was not anticipating the backlash he received in response to his bill that would restrict multiple breeds of dogs and their mixes.

We have been hearing rumors that he pulled the bill since roughly 72 hours after the bills introduction.

This bill is officially dead, though there is some confusion as to whether this was a voluntary action or an action by the assigned committee.  In a news report it is stated the bill died in committee, not that Rep. Moore pulled it.

The breeds of dogs targeted by this bill were Rottweiler, Mastiff, Chow, Presa Canario, wolf hybrid, pit bull (which are defined as Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, and American Pit Bull Terrier).

In the same report Rep. Moore is quote saying, “he wasn’t sure that the breeds designated by the bill as aggressive are ones “with the most incidents,” but he said they “were the most prevalent by the feedback that I’ve gotten.”

Initially, Rep. Moore was saying that he created the list of targeted breeds based off of those restricted by insurance companies.  This may be the “feedback” he is referring to.

Regardless of the reason the bill has died, we are pleased with the outcome.

Some people having been expressing support for this legislation, which would require a criminal background check, as well as a class to own the previously mentioned dogs.  We feel that a much larger point was being missed in support of the bill. Aside from the fact the breed discrimination is breed discrimination, no matter how you package it, this bill by default would have legally labeled all dogs of those breeds, their mixes and their look a likes as aggressive.

We already know where this road leads. We can look to Ohio as an example.  The severity of the restrictions does not matter. Such a label on the state level targeting certain breeds creates an avalanche of local municipalities that create tighter restrictions on the same dogs targeted by state law, as well as creating a dangerous precedent for other states.  One can applaud intentions but should never applaud intentions implemented in a thoughtless or reckless way that would create a swath of chaos in its wake.

First alert for NC, Second alert for NC

Chippewa Falls Wisconsin rejects breed discrimination

Thursday night city leaders in Chippewa Falls Wisconsin rejected the call for a ban that would target certain types of dogs.

City leaders agreed Thursday night at a Committee of the Whole meeting that a ban on any single dog breed would not be a positive solution to the city’s dog problems.Read more

Rejection of a breed discriminatory law was unanimous among the committee members.  Instead, they will be looking at breed neutral regulations that will add stiffer penalties for people who are not operating proper care and control of their dogs.  The changes being looked at are increasing fines for dogs at large, hiring an animal control officer to deal with dogs at large, and administrative fees for people whose dogs are confiscated and causing expense to the city.

Officials are also looking into a better way to proactively protect the community from dogs that have proven to be a danger to the community, like clearer administrative protocols for dogs that have already shown dangerous behavior.

We applaud officials for rejecting the unenforceable and going, instead, to common sense effective alternatives to creating a safer community for all the residents of Chippewa falls.  Constituents may reach out and thank them for doing what is best for the entire community.

Royal Oak Michigan goes breed neutral

After an attack on a dog in December, Royal Oak Michigan was considering instituting a breed specific law.  Monday March 18th the Board of Commissioners met in Royal Oak to discuss amendments to the cities dangerous dog laws.

City Attorney David Gillam recommended that Royal Oak adopt an ordinance similar to Farmington Hills and Wyandotte, which both have three classifications for dogs: dangerous, potentially dangerous and all others. Currently, Royal Oak has no way to address dogs that do not technically meet the definition of dangerous but that have exhibited behavior that would allow officials to reasonably conclude that the dog may become a threat to the community.  It short they have no “potentially dangerous” classification.

Officials will also be conducting a “dog census.” Council members said that almost all dogs that have been found at large or involved in a bite were unregistered. The census will be an attempt to begin getting a handle on exactly how many dogs there are in town and increasing registration numbers.

The following is an excerpt from the commission meeting letter on this matter from last night.

The chief of police has discussed the issue with the City’s Animal Control Officer.  At this time, neither the Police Department nor my office supports the adoption of a breed specific ordinance here in Royal Oak.”

The full letter can be found here.

Congratulations to Royal Oak advocates on a job well done.

Previous Alert for Royal Oak.

Rhode Island and Broward county Florida pull “pit bull” bills

RHODE ISLAND: We received news from the Defenders of Animals that the Senator who introduced legislation in Rhode Island to create statewide restrictions on pit bull type dogs has officially withdrawn his bill from the Senate. The companion House Bill has also been withdrawn. With all the opposition to this bill it was destined to not proceed but it is always nice to see legislators respond to the concerns of their constituents with action.

With the outcry of opposition from Rhode Island residents there is bound to be some positive legislative action in the future for breed specific laws. Congratulations Rhode Island for making your voices heard.

The sponsor had said his intention was to start a conversation and get the attention of national organizations to get help for their town.  They are receiving the help that they needed to form a breed neutral law to better protect the community.

BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA: Commissioner Barbara Sharief had planned on trying to approach the state legislature in Florida to ask for permission to pass a pit bull ban.  Sharief had cited concerns from her district about “pit bulls” that had been dumped from neighboring Miami-Dade as the reason for the action.

Initially, Sharief said she knew there would be a backlash but there was more support for a breed ban than opposition. At this weeks commission meeting, however, Sharief was proven wrong when the meeting was packed with opponents to the measure. 60 people spoke at the meeting with the vast majority of those against any breed specific law. One commissioner said when he stopped keeping track of the e-mails he received about this issue there were over 1,000 against it and only 11 for. Sharief subsequently pulled the motion from committee.

A couple of very important things to note about the meeting.  When the other commissioners spoke about the measure most said they would not support any request to go to the state to try to institute a breed discriminatory measure in the future. One Councilor spoke very clearly about their support for the state law prohibiting breed specific laws.  They noted that the issues they are having is because of Miami’s ban and that it would be bad for the community as a whole to allow towns to decide on their own if they want a breed specific law.

Another important thing to note is that Commissioner Sharief showed very clearly that she is willing to listen to the community and respond.  She is now working with advocates and animal groups to find a solution to the issues Broward County is having. It does not matter that we disagree with law makers, we must always engage in a respectful dialogue. When people behave with a lack of respect for law makers they become less likely to listen to what is being said.  Always be polite, be professional and be respectful with all communications with legislators.

Yalobusha County, MS – BSL DEFEATED

Officials in Yalobusha County, Mississippi voted unanimously to enact a vicious dog ordinance at the Board of Supervisors meeting on November 20.  The ordinance will go into effect on December 22, 2012.

Read more Bless The Bullys Commentary….

Review the ordinance….

Sioux Falls, SD update: Committee says BSL not necessary

After discussion at the end of July, the Sioux Falls, SD, Land Use Committee decided against BSL. Councilman Karsky, who had originally proposed BSL, still felt that it was necessary, but he was overruled. The committee will go forward with some minor, breed-neutral ordinance revisions.

No need to toughen dog laws, panel says

8:54 AM, Jul 31, 2012
Written by Sarah Reinecke

Sioux Falls doesn’t need to overhaul ordinances regarding dog bites or dog breeds, a panel decided Monday.

The City Council’s Land Use Committee heard presentations from animal experts and determined dog bites and vicious dogs are not a problem here. Instead of major changes, the committee will consider a few minor tweaks to city laws at a meeting next month. [...]

Full article retrieved 8/2/12 from http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012307310035

Contact info if you wish to thank the Sioux Falls land use committee:
Rex Rolfing (Chair), Kermit Staggers, Dean Karsky, Kenny Anderson Jr.
rrolfing@siouxfalls.org; kstaggers@siouxfalls.org; dkarsky@siouxfalls.org; kandersonjr@siouxfalls.org

Many thanks also to the advocates and experts who spoke against BSL to the Land Use Committee.

Thanks to Michelle for this update!

Hinesville, GA update: Council will not pursue BSL

The Hinesville, GA, city council rejected BSL at a weekend planning retreat and appears disinclined to bring the subject up again.

BSL was a discussion item after a resident made repeated requests for BSL to council, but council never formally drew up a proposal and they unanimously killed the idea after discussion.

Pit-bull issue elicits strong emotions

POSTED: July 27, 2012 11:17 a.m.
By Randy C. Murray Staff writer

A proposed ordinance to ban pit bulls in Hinesville was among 38 issues considered by city leaders during their recent planning workshop, but it quickly was shot down by all five council members, Mayor Jim Thomas and other city officials.

(Remainder of article is subscription only) Retrieved 8/2/12 from http://coastalcourier.com/section/6/article/46207/preview/

You can THANK the city council through this online form: http://ga-hinesville.civicplus.com/forms.aspx?fid=41

Many thanks to Johanna over at Stubby’s Heroes for providing the update!

All alerts for Hinesville: http://stopbsl.org/?s=hinesville