Category Archives: BSL Proposed

Covington, LA: BSL under consideration

Covington considered BSL some ten years ago, but ultimately decided against it. Now they’re considering it again.

Contact information for Covington city council:
lalexius@bellsouth.net; rsokeefe@bellsouth.net; jcallahan50@bellsouth.net; jconer@covla.com; markalexanderwright@hotmail.com; rollingdistrictd@aol.com; rsmith@covla.com
City Council Office, 317 N. Jefferson Ave., Covington, LA 70433
Phone: (985) 898-4722
Fax: (985) 898-4723
council@covla.com

Next city council meeting: May 15, 6:00 PM, in Council Chambers at 222 Kirkland St., Covington, LA. 70433

Current animal ordinances can be read here.

Covington council to consider tougher pit bull restrictions

Published: Wednesday, May 02, 2012, 3:58 PM
By Claire Galofaro, The Times-Picayune

[...] On Tuesday night, [Covington City Councilman Lee] Alexius suggested the City Council consider creating a law to restrict pit bull ownership. Other Louisiana cities, he said, have strict requirements for pit bull owners: from mandating the size of kennels to requiring owners to carry hefty insurance policies and have their pit bulls registered and microchipped.[...]

Now, the Covington Council’s public safety committee, including Councilmen Sam O’Keefe, Jerry Coner and Larry Rolling, will consider other jurisdictions’ ordinances, then fashion a law for Covington’s pit bull owners. The committee will present its decision to the Council, hold a public meeting, then vote on its passage. [...]

Full article retrieved 5/2/12 from http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/05/covington_council_to_consider.html

Tupelo, MS: Council declines to vote on BSL

Tupelo, MS, already has BSL for “pit bull” owners. Over the last six months, they’ve considered various changes to their dog law, all of which included BSL. Council was set to vote on the proposal on May 1, but ultimately did not.

This leaves in place all of Tupelo’s current animal ordinances—which INCLUDES current BSL for “pit bulls.” You can read Tupelo’s current animal ordinances here.

We do not know when or if the council will bring the ordinance revisions back up for consideration. We would appreciate the help of locals to keep an eye on this issue.

Contact info for city officials: City Hall, 71 East Troy Street, Tupelo, MS 38804 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1485, Tupelo, MS 38802-1485 662-841-6513

Email block for cut-and-paste
Jack.Reed@tupeloms.gov; markel.whittington@comcast.net; rfred@sguard.net; jimwnewell@comcast.net; nettiedavisward4@bellsouth.net; jstuartdavis@yahoo.com; mike.bryan@comcast.net; wljennings@yahoo.com

All alerts for Tupelo: http://stopbsl.com/?s=tupelo

No vote on dangerous dog ordinance

Print Story Published: 5/01 7:37 pm

TUPLEO, Miss. (WTVA) — The Tupelo City Council was asked Tuesday evening to consider passing a law that would target pit bulls.

But, the council decided to pass on taking up the proposal altogether.

Full article retrieved 5/2/12 from http://www.wtva.com/news/local/story/No-vote-on-dangerous-dog-ordinance/FfBPFnB77k2HjYd4N_Wy5g.cspx

Tupelo, MS: BSL will be voted on, May 1

Tupelo, MS, is revising their animal control ordinances. They already had BSL for “pit bulls” and had considered adding German Shepherds, Rottweilers, and Dobermans to the list of “dangerous breeds.”

The additional breeds have now been dropped, but “pit bulls” remain named in the new ordinances as automatically “dangerous” dogs. Appallingly, the BSL against “pit bull” owners has the support of the Tupelo-Lee Humane Society director Debbie Hood.

City officials will vote on the proposed ordinance during their meeting on May 1 at  at 6:00 PM at City Hall, 71 East Troy Street.

Contact info for city officials: City Hall, 71 East Troy Street, Tupelo, MS 38804 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1485, Tupelo, MS 38802-1485 662-841-6513

Email block for cut-and-paste Jack.Reed@tupeloms.gov; markel.whittington@comcast.net; rfred@sguard.net; jimwnewell@comcast.net; nettiedavisward4@bellsouth.net; jstuartdavis@yahoo.com; mike.bryan@comcast.net; wljennings@yahoo.com

All alerts for Tupelo: http://stopbsl.com/?s=tupelo

Tupelo looks to strengthen rules on pets

by Emily Le Coz/NEMS Daily Journal

TUPELO – [...] Animals are deemed dangerous when, unprovoked, they threaten or attack a person or another pet; if they’re owned or trained primarily for fighting; or if they’re a pure or mixed-breed pit bull.

The definition hasn’t changed from the existing ordinance. But, unlike at least one previous proposal, this one omits the automatic classification of Rottweilers, German Shepherds and Doberman Pinschers as dangerous.

Some animal advocates, including veterinarian Stephen King, had argued against singling out specific breeds, saying it unfairly penalizes responsible pet owners. Others, like Ward 5 Councilman Jonny Davis, had lobbied for it because of the breeds’ size and strength and the damage they could cause.

Both Davis and King renewed their positions Tuesday, as did Ward 3 Councilman Jim Newell, who argued extensively against leaving pit bulls in the ordinance. He wanted no mention of breeds whatsoever. [...]

Prior to the meeting, Tupelo-Lee Humane Society Director Debbie Hood said she opposes most breed-specific legislation but approves the inclusion of pit bulls in the ordinance. [...]

Full article retrieved 4/29/12 from http://www.nems360.com/view/full_story/18348750/article-Tupelo-looks-to-strengthen-rules-on-pets?instance=lead_story_left_column

Portsmouth, OH reminder: Proposed BSL second reading, April 23

Portsmouth, OH, is rewriting their vicious dog ordinance. The current proposal is breed-specific. Pit bull owners will have to meet several requirements, including special containment.

Read the current proposal: Portsmouth Dog Ordinance 3-18-12
(Many thanks to Lena for making this proposal available.)

The next city council meeting takes place on April 23 at 6:00 PM. The ordinance will have a second reading and probably a vote. Residents and locals, please attend the meeting and take this opportunity to reiterate your opposition to BSL.

Please RESPECTFULLY contact Portsmouth city officials and remind them that breed-specific laws don’t improve public safety, are expensive, and are unjust. Provide alternative breed-neutral vicious dog laws for their consideration. RESPECTFULLY ask Portsmouth officials to remove the breed-specific language from their proposal.

City council email block (NOTE: one councilmember does not have email):
kwwj@roadrunner.com; rich@saddler.me; jkalb@roadrunner.com; ii6svvh@yahoo.com; ssturgill@zoomnet.net; TNathan@portsmouthoh.org; dmalone@portsmouthoh.org; andrew.gedeon@odh.ohio.gov

All alerts for Portsmouth, OH: http://stopbsl.com/?s=portsmouth

Malden, MA: Mayor asks council to amend proposal, remove BSL

Many thanks to Jo for keeping us apprised of the situation in Malden.

Malden mayor Christenson has sent proposed BSL back, unsigned, to the city council, along with an amendment that he would like the council to pass. The amendment would remove the breed-specific language, among other things.

The city website contains a description of the mayor’s decision, a letter from the mayor to council, and a link to the mayor’s proposed amendment.

From http://www.cityofmalden.org/

Mayor Submits Decision on Pit Bull Ordinance

Today, Mayor Christenson returned Paper 246, otherwise known as the “Pit Bull Ordinance,” to the City Council unsigned but with suggested changes. A copy of the Mayor’s letter to the City Council explaining his reasons for returning the Paper along with a copy of the Mayor’s proposed amendment can be found in the links below. Some of the highlights of the proposed amendment are as follows:

  • The amendment does not contain breed specific language but muzzling remains an option for dogs of all breeds;
  • A new section was established dealing with irresponsible dog owners;
  • There is also a new section called “Potentially Dangerous Dogs” that enhances Paper 246 which currently only deals with dogs that bite or have a known propensity to bite. This new section would serve as a preventive measure where the Animal Control Officer would be allowed to get at dogs ahead of when they might bite and eventually be deemed “dangerous or vicious;”
  • Expanded the definition of what a dangerous or vicious dog is to include a dog’s mannerisms and for dogs owned or trained for dog fighting;
  • There are provisions that address insurance and property owner notification that a potentially dangerous or dangerous or vicious dog resides at the property;
  • Signage requirements have been added for both potentially and dangerous or vicious dogs;
  • An “intimidation” provision has been added for both the irresponsible owner and aggressive dog;
  • New sections have been added to address both indoor and outdoor confinement which goes beyond the fencing provision contained in Paper 246; and
  • A licensing surcharge of $50 for dangerous or vicious dogs has been added and the penalty for non-compliance of the dangerous or vicious dog section has been increased to $300 per day.

The Office of Mayor Gary Christenson would like to thank all who have called, written or emailed over the past month so that their voice on this issue may be heard. We received much information on both the pros and cons of this Paper. This feedback was invaluable to our decision making process.

Click here to see the Mayor’s Letter to City Council on Paper 246

Click here to see the Mayor’s Proposed Amendment to City Council on Paper 246

The next council meeting is not until May. In the meantime, please respectfully correspond with city council and encourage them to pass the mayor’s amendment in lieu of the discriminatory and unenforceable ”pit bull”-only muzzle law. This is an excellent opportunity for Malden to distinguish itself from the pack of MA cities with failing BSL.

Contact info for Malden, MA city officials
200 Pleasant Street, Room 609, Malden, MA 02148
Email: citycouncil@cityofmalden.org
Telephone: (781) 397-7130 Fax: (781) 397-7004

Christenson sends pit bull law back to City Council

By Matt Byrne, Town Correspondent, Globe Staff
April 20, 2012

Malden Mayor Gary Christenson sent back to the City Council a controversial ordinance that would have required pit bulls to wear muzzles when outside their owners’ homes.

“The ordinance should be centered on how a dog behaves and not how a dog looks, as I believe this legislation suggests,” Christenson wrote in a letter to the council that outlined an amended version of the law. [..]

Full article retrieved 4/21/12 http://articles.boston.com/2012-04-20/yourtown/31375025_1_pit-bull-law-dangerous-dog-irresponsible-dog-owner

All alerts for Malden: http://stopbsl.com/?s=%22malden%2C+ma%22

Tupelo, MS update: Council may vote on BSL, May 1

Many thanks to Jodi for this update!
http://blessthebullys.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/amendment-to-dangerous-dog-ordinance-moves-forward-tupelo-ms/

Last night, the Tupelo, MS city council discussed amending its dangerous dog ordinance to add rottweilers and dobermans to the list of “dangerous dogs.” Because the issue was on the study agenda, no vote was taken. However, the city clerk has confirmed that the council did move the issue forward, and it will be placed on the action agenda for the May 1, 2012 city council meeting. Items on the action agenda are up for vote by the council.

The City of Tupelo already has regulations in place for “pit bulls” which include licensing, registering and securing permits. Owners of “pit bulls” must also post signage and meet confinement restrictions.

Please contact the Tupelo city officials with your polite, respectful and informative opposition to breed specific legislation. Its important to remember in all your interactions with any city official that you are representing responsible dog owners as a whole, and that negative communications can and will reflect very poorly on the very people you are trying to help.

Contact info for city officials:
City Hall, 71 East Troy Street, Tupelo, MS 38804
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1485, Tupelo, MS 38802-1485
662-841-6513

Email block for cut-and-paste
Jack.Reed@tupeloms.gov; markel.whittington@comcast.net; rfred@sguard.net; jimwnewell@comcast.net; nettiedavisward4@bellsouth.net; jstuartdavis@yahoo.com; mike.bryan@comcast.net; wljennings@yahoo.com

All alerts for Tupelo: http://stopbsl.com/?s=tupelo

Ventura County, CA: Oxnard to hold discussion session on BS-MSN, April 17

The Ventura County Animal Regulation Commission wants to pass a breed-discriminatory mandatory spay/neuter law that would only apply to owners of dogs with a “pit bull” appearance. To do this, the county wants buy-in from all of its cities.

Oxnard, CA, will hold a study session to discuss the county’s BS-MSN proposal during the April 17 council meeting at 7:00 PM. The public is given time to comment on the study session after staff presentation and before council discussion. If you are a resident or local, please attend the council meeting and express your opposition to BSL of any kind.

Please encourage city officials to drop the breed-specific language in their proposals. Breed-specific MSN—like any other breed-specific law—discriminates against people and their dogs based on whether the owner or dog have a “desirable” or “undesirable” physical appearance.

Whether you support or oppose MSN, it doesn’t need to be breed-specific. If MSN is good for dogs that look like “pit bulls,” it is good for any dog. By removing the breed-specific focus, the county and cities can avoid the expense and inequality that goes with BSL.

City of Oxnard Mayor and City Council
drtomholden@aol.com, irene.pinkard@ci.oxnard.ca.us, bryan.macdonald@ci.oxnard.ca.us, timbflynn@gmail.com, carmen4oxnard@gmail.com

All alerts for Ventura County: http://stopbsl.com/?s=ventura+county