Category Archives: Outside of U.S.

Winnipeg, MB, Canada: City will not repeal breed ban

Contact information for Winnipeg City Hall:
City Hall, Council Building, 510 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 1B9
Contact page for Councillors: http://www.winnipeg.ca/council/contact.stm

Facebook group to repeal the ban: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Help-Repeal-Winnipegs-Pit-Bull-Ban/166789433355315?v=wall

City won’t lift ban on pit bulls

By: Jen Skerritt
Posted: 1:00 AM

WINNIPEG’S ban on pit bulls is here to stay as officials worry lifting it could cause more overcrowding in city animal shelters.

Last year, animal advocates urged the city to consider repealing the pit-bull ban as part of its wider review of responsible pet ownership. [...]

Winnipeg’s revamped pet-ownership bylaw will not be made public until fall, but on Monday, animal services chief operating officer Leland Gordon said the department does not support repealing the ban. [...]

Full article retrieved 5/29/12 from http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/city-wont-lift-ban-on-pit-bulls-155263825.html

All alerts for Winnipeg: http://stopbsl.com/?s=winnipeg

Trinidad and Tobago: BSL to go into effect, August 2012

We last reported on Trinidad and Tobago in May 2011. Trinidad and Tobago has had BSL in place since 2000 (regulating “pit bulls,” Japanese Tosa, and Fila Brasiliero), but the Act has never been enforced. T&T government has decided to enforce the BSL, effective August 2012.

Last year, the government was considering some revisions to the Dangerous Dogs Act, but as of today, they have decided not to revise it. The T&T Dangerous Dogs Act currently mirrors the Dangerous Dog Act of the UK, which has been a miserable failure.

The following news article also contains the text of the DDA for T&T. Click the article link (below) to read the entire article and to see the text of the DDA.

Man’s best friend in the doghouse

By CAROL MATROO Sunday, May 20 2012

Despite misgivings by various interest groups and dog lovers throughout Trinidad and Tobago, Government will apparently make the Dangerous Dogs Act law on August 1 without amendment.

The act, originally inspired by former attorney general Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, was passed in June 2000 but was never proclaimed. It requires owners of dangerous dogs to be at least 18 years old, carry $250,000 insurance, adhere to special containment requirements, sterilisation and registration, and to apply and obtain a $500 annual licence per dog. [...]

Full article retrieved 5/21/12 from http://www.newsday.co.tt/features/0,160437.html

All alerts for T&T: http://www.stopbsl.org/?s=trinidad

Wagmatcook, NS, Canada: Whispers of BSL

Back in January, Wagmatcook First Nation reserve band council had a “pit bull” ban on their agenda. That effort did not succeed, but after a recent dog bite(involving a dog that was tethered), some in the community are apparently calling for a breed ban again.

Wagmatcook First Nation is a reserve. This is all the contact information I have.

Council of Wagmatcook Band, P.O. Box 30001, Wagmatcook, NS B0E 3N0
Chief Norman Bernard, Wagmatcook First Nation
Tribal Council: Union of Nova Scotia Indians, P.O. Box 237 Baddeck, NS B0E 1B0
Phone: (902) 295-2598
Fax: (902) 295-3398

Pit bull attacks Cape Breton woman

New calls to ban the breed on Wagmatcook reserve

CBC News Posted: May 18, 2012 7:47 PM AT

[...] The January attack sparked calls for a ban on pit bulls on the reserve. Peck seconded that call, adding there are a lot of them in the community.

“They should ban the dogs around here, because the owners are making them more aggressive. They’re already aggressive anyway,” she said. [...]

Full article retrieved 5/20/12 from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2012/05/18/ns-woman-bit-pitbull.html

All alerts for Wagmatcook: http://stopbsl.org/?s=wagmatcook

 

Ontario, Canada: Final committee hearing on Bill 16, May 9

Bill 16, which would repeal the breed ban in Ontario, will have a final hearing in the Standing Committee of Regulations and Private Bills on May 9 at 9:00 AM.

If the bill passes the committee, it will be ready for a third reading in the full Ontario Legislative Assembly—but the majority party has to call it for a third reading, and it’s not clear if that will happen.

There should be a live webcast on May 9, starting at 9:00 am, if you want to follow the clause-by-clause voting on Bill 16: http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/go2.jsp?Page=/webcast/webcast_main&locale=en&menuItem=dandp_webcast

You can read the transcripts from the previous committee hearings here:

(April 25) http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?Date=2012-04-25&ParlCommID=8962&BillID=2552&Business&locale=en&DocumentID=26243

(April 18) http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?locale=en&Date=2012-04-18&ParlCommID=8962&BillID=2552&Business&DocumentID=26206

All alerts for Ontario Bill 16: http://stopbsl.com/?s=%22Bill+16%22

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada: Dog owner wins battle against breed misidentification

After nearly two years, an Oshawa dog owner has won a legal battle with the city. Animal control identified her nonaggressive dog as a “pit bull” and scheduled it for death; she fought the breed ID in court and finally won.

Ontario Bill 16 would repeal the “pit bull” ban and put a stop to senseless legal nightmares like this. If you have not already written to Ontario lawmakers to show your support for Bill 16, please do so today. (If you have, please continue to do so.)

‘Pit bull’ dispute: Oshawa woman wins battle to keep dog from being euthanized

Alyshah Hasham, Staff Reporter

If Scarlett is a pit bull she dies, if she is a Rhodesian ridgeback-boxer cross she lives.

Differentiating the two took a year-and-a-half-long legal battle for Scarlett’s owner Jane Nolan after Oshawa animal services workers labelled the dog a pit bull when she escaped into a neighbour’s yard. [...]

Since the pit bull isn’t considered a breed of dog in Canada — it’s a generic term used in the Dog Owner’s Liability Act to ban breeds like Staffordshire bull terriers or even dogs resembling them — it can be near impossible to identify them, even for vets.

“There is no scientific basis to assess whether a dog is a pit bull or not … Veterinarians, some will identify them, some don’t feel comfortable identifying them,” said Jerry Conlin, director of municipal law enforcement and licensing in Oshawa. [...]

Full article retrieved 4/29/12 from http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1168114–pit-bull-dispute-oshawa-woman-wins-battle-to-keep-dog-from-being-euthanized

UK: Government’s proposed DDA revisions met with disappointment

DEFRA, the UK government arm that is in charge of the Dangerous Dogs Act, announced a number of proposed changes to the Act on Monday.

Disappointingly, but not unexpectedly, the government does not plan to repeal the breed-specific portions of the DDA. There is only slight relief for owners of “banned types” in the proposals: non-dangerous “banned type” dogs might be allowed to remain at home, rather than seized and kennelled, while the courts decide the dog’s fate. (Yes, you read that right. The government knows not all “banned type” dogs are dangerous. We have to wonder: why is the government determined to keep a ban on non-dangerous dogs?) And on the flip side, DEFRA wants it to cost more for owners to put their non-dangerous dogs on the exemption register.

Read the DEFRA press release about the proposed changes: http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2012/04/23/clampdown-on-dangerous-dogs/

DEFRA also opened a new public consultation on the suggested changes to the law. The consulatation is an online survey and it is open to the public.

Go fill it out! The survey features a number of open-response boxes. We recommend repeatedly requesting that DEFRA remove the breed-specific portion of the DDA.

Answer the public survey on DEFRA’s proposals here: http://www.defra.gov.uk/consult/2012/04/23/dangerous-dogs-1204/

News articles and more news articles about DEFRA’s proposal:

Dangerous dogs measures dismissed as ‘tinkering’ (The Independent)

Chance to tighten law on danger dog attacks missed say charities (Yorkshire Post)

Attack victims: Danger dog changes don’t go far enough (Telegraph and Argus)

Government ‘dragging feet’ over dangerous dogs (ITN)

Battersea Dogs Home disappointed at government over new dog legislation (Battersea People)

Dog owners could be prosecuted if their pets savage burglars under Defra plan (Telegraph)

Harbin, China: City bans 49 breeds

Harbin, China, has banned 49 “dangerous” breeds (and imposed a size limit on top of that). Harbin is the 10th most populated city in China, with a population of over 10 million. The new ban has the potential to make tens of thousands of beloved pet dogs homeless. Although the government says that they will relocate the banned dogs outside of the city, not kill them, it’s not exactly clear how they intend to accomplish such a goal. How are they going to find enough homes to adopt so many dogs?

The banned breeds are (sorry, rough translations): Tibetan Mastiff, Pit Bull Terrier, Argentine Dogo dogs Brazilian non-pull dogs, Japanese Tosa, Asian shepherd, the Chuandong dogs, the Soviet Union Collie, German Shepherd, Bull Terrier, English Mastiff, Cane Corso, Italy, Great Dane, the Russian Caucasus, Italian twist Bolivarian Dayton, Stavros, the Afghan hound, the Boeing dogs, Weimaraner, the Bloodhound, the Ba Xianji dog, English Bulldog, Akita, Newfoundland dogs, Kerry Blue Terrier, Chinese pastoral dogs, the Soviet Red Dog, Kunming Dog, Doberman , Belgian shepherd, Rottweiler, large wheat-cho, dog, St. Bernard dog, the Great Pyrenees Sheepdog Irish shepherd dog Shaq, Greyhound, Australian Shepherd, Flanders Collie Netherlands gross lion dog, Bird Terrier Alaska dog, Husky, Golden Retriever dogs, Chow Chow, Samoyed, Labrador, snow dogs.

Harbin ban on big dogs stirs up howls of protest

Updated: 2012-04-19 08:12
By Tian Xuefei and Zhou Huiying in Harbin (China Daily)

Under a new regulation, dogs taller than 50 cm, longer than 70 cm or on a list of 49 breeds considered “dangerous” will be banned from downtown Harbin.

[...] According to the regulation, local residents must resettle their large and dangerous dogs between April 1 and Oct 31. After that, police will remove any large dogs from the downtown area. [...]

“After Nov 1, we will establish a place where we can put the large dogs, but we will not kill any of them. We will call on organizations and people outside the city to adopt them,” said Han Zhi, vice-director of Harbin public security bureau, at a Wednesday news conference.

Though the online rumor that the dogs would be killed was denied, many said they still found it difficult to accept that many docile dogs, including Labradors, Samoyeds and golden retrievers, were on the list.

“When the one-dog policy was published, I never thought that these breeds would be included,” said Zhao Boshi, an owner of a 4-year-old golden retriever named Nike. [...]

A report by Harbin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated that dogs bit 1,300 people during the first two months of this year. Fear of dogs, especially large ones, makes some of the non-dog owners support the regulation. [...]

Full article retrieved 4/21/12 from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2012-04/19/content_15085525.htm