City officials in League City, Texas, have begun to talk about instituting a breed discriminatory law.
Following an attack by a dog identified as a pit bull, city officials are looking at restrictions for “pit bulls.”
A toddler and mother were watching the mother’s boyfriends dog when the dog attacked. There have been no details as to the moments leading up to the attack or how well know the dog was to the victims.
Councilman Todd Kinsey has said that he would like to see breed based restrictions enacted in the city. He claims that local statistics point to the need for a breed based law. These numbers have not as yet been supplied to the public, nor have any details regarding any circumstances of these incidents such as free roaming or chained dogs, percentage of incidents that were dog on dog, dog on human, sexual status of the attacking dog, how the “breed” of the dog is being identified and other such pertinent information.
Kinsey claimed that 80% of attacks “resulting in injury” are by dogs identified as pit bulls. This claim leaves out the actual number of attacks in League City, total number of attacks attributed to “pit bulls” as well as population of dogs being identified as pit bulls in the community. Without this information, the claim of 80% is specious at best.
At a city council meeting the Police Chief outlined several measures for the control of “dangerous dogs.” The following were options discussed: mandatory microchips, fluorescent ID tags and sterilization of dogs meeting a definition of dangerous. Chief Kramm also included the idea that a dog deemed dangerous be euthanized or banned from the city limits.
Officials are aware that there is a law in Texas that prohibits the enactment of a breed discriminatory law. However, they seem to be under the impression that such a law applies only to a breed ban, and not restrictions.
From a recent article: “According to Police Chief Kramm, Texas law prohibits the banning of specific breeds but it would be possible to increase regulations for pit bulls.Kinsey said he would like to see higher registration fees for pit bulls, extra security fences so they are unable to dig out of yards as well as special liability insurance requirements.”I’m in favor of making it difficult for people who want to own pit bulls in our community,” Kinsey said.”
Texas state law prohibits any form of breed discriminatory law, including restrictions.”
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
TITLE 10. HEALTH AND SAFETY OF ANIMALS
CHAPTER 822. REGULATION OF ANIMALS
SUBCHAPTER D. DANGEROUS DOGS
§ 822.047. LOCAL REGULATION OF DANGEROUS DOGS.
A county or municipality may place additional requirements or restrictions on dangerous dogs if the requirements or restrictions:
(1) are not specific to one breed or several breeds of dogs; and
(2) are more stringent than restrictions provided by this subchapter.
It is clear in the statute that this applies not only to bans but also to restrictions.
Nothing official has been proposed at this time, but residents and locals should attend council meetings to urge for reckless owner ordinances, and the strengthening of the current dangerous dog law that would create more nuanced categories and more stringent penalties for those who do not operate proper care and control of their dogs.
Fred M. Kray
krisdiaz9
Stop BSL 