Nevada is considering prohibiting breed specific legislation on the state level. The Nevada General assembly will hear this bill on the 26th of February at 8 am in Room 3138 of the Legislative Building at 401 S. Carson St., Carson City, Nevada.
The text of the bill can be found here.
“A dog may not be found dangerous or vicious : (a) Based solely on the breed of the dog;”
Simple and straight forward.
Nevada residents: Act now and voice your support for AB 110. Best Friends has set up yet another handy form to contact legislators. Contact information links for the Senate and the Assembly.
A little while ago we received word about SD (Senate Docket) 1247 that would create an exemption from the new state law the prohibits breed specific legislation.
This bill has been renamed and has been sent to the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government. SB 969 is the same as SD 1247. The wording is identical, in that it will insert an exemption into the new comprehensive animal control law that would allow a municipality to prove through municipal bite statistics that they should be allowed to enact a breed specific law.
Massachusetts Residents: Swift action is needed. Reach out to your legislators and the members of the committee and ask them to opposed this bill. Committee members can be found here. Specific legislators can be found on the government website, or if you are uncomfortable composing your own correspondence Best Friends Animal Society has created an alert form here.
Best Friends Animal Society has issued the following alerts:
Maryland: A bill has been introduced that would prevent insurance companies from discriminating against both home owners and renters based on the breed of their dog. Under this bill an insurance company would be prohibited from refusing to renew or refuse a policy based solely on the breed of the applicants dog. It would also prohibit insurance companies from refusing liability coverage for damages cause by the dog of the insured.
Maryland residents, please reach out to your representatives via the Best Friends action alert form. Let them know you want them to support SB296. This bill would not only protect dog owners but it also protects victims of dog bites from all breeds by making sure the insurance company must take care of their expenses. This would be a great step forward for any community but especially for Maryland after the impact of Tracey v. Solesky.
A hearing has been scheduled for February 5th which is the same date as the hearing for SB 160 the Senate bill to address Tracey v. Solesky. Reach out and let your voice be heard.
Connecticut: A bill has been introduced that would allow communities to institute dangerous dog laws as long as they are not breed specific. The passage of this bill would be a great step forward for all the people of Connecticut, dog owners and non-dog owners alike.
HB 5975 has been referred to the Joint Committee on Planning and Development.
Best Friends has set up another easy to use contact form for Connecticut residents to express support for HB 5975.
Connecticut residents, please reach out and tell your representatives that you want them to support this bill. More states recognizing the need to outlaw breed specific legislation but the voice of the people is needed to confirm they are doing the right thing.
Posted in Connecticut, Maryland, State Specific
Tagged connecticut hb 5975, connecticut hb5975, legislation, legislature, liability insurance, maryland bsl, Maryland Legislature, maryland sb 160, maryland sb160, pit bull, state protection from breed specific legislation, state protection from bsl, statewide